Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Fourth Reich (album)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete No independent sources, and parent article deleted. Guy (Help!) 16:03, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

The Fourth Reich (album)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No coverage in reliable sources to verify or sustain an article. Fails general notability and WP:NALBUMS. Jbh (talk) 13:45, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  13:51, 4 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete: I'm not sure what I'm supposed to add to the above. The album was reviewed in a few personal blogs, but no coverage can be found from reliable third-party sources. No way a significant article on this topic could be written an pass the demands of Verifiability. see above. - Metal lunchbox (talk) 10:47, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:01, 5 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep This is a notable Dethcentrik album with third-party reviews. --BusyWikipedian (talk) 15:15, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note - — BusyWikipedian (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.  Jbh (talk) 15:32, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Please see my contributions-BusyWikipedian (talk) 15:24, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Sorry, when I looked at your contributions all I saw were edits related to Død Beverte who is a member of Dethcentrik and Død Incarnate Records including the Deathcentric albums which are not even remotly near passing WP:NALBUM. I should have looked deeper. Striking SPA and will do so at the other AfDs related to Deathcentric. Jbh (talk) 15:42, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Comment To be specific WP:NALBUMS requires significant non-trivial coverage in RS. Having the album chart on a national chart (in the US that is one based on Nielson's Soundscan), be nominated for a major award (ie Grammy or equivalent), etc. One review is not significant coverage . Jbh (talk) 22:11, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon  01:18, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment - Dethcentrik deleted at AfD, Delete CSD A9 Jbh (talk) 00:37, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.