Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Fourth Wish


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   WITHDRAWN --  Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 23:41, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

The Fourth Wish

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Unnnotable film. Fails WP:NF and WP:N Prod removed by creator with statement that "it is notable" without providing any actual proof. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 21:29, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. — --  Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 21:30, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep You did no research to prove that it is not notable--TheMovieBuff (talk) 21:34, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Please provide proof that Collectonian did no research. LessHeard vanU (talk) 23:11, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The simple fact that it is not humanly possible to nominate all these articls for deletion and do research to see if they are notable in a matter of about 30 seconds.--TheMovieBuff (talk) 23:40, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Delete per nom. Alan -  talk  21:43, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: I found a short review, but that's not enough. Fails WP:NF. Joe Chill (talk) 21:55, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep of award wining film per Sydney Morning Herald 1, The Age 1, The Age 2, The Age 3, The Age 4, Sydney Morning Herald 2, The Age 5, The Age 6, and dozens of others. To User:LessHeard vanU... perhaps the nominator did see these articles in her diligent WP:BEFORE.... but that assumption of good faith would mean she purposely ignored them and the stub's WP:POTENTIAL for WP:IMPROVEment through WP:ATD.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 23:30, 4 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep - Film was nominated for four Australian Film Institute Awards, including for screenplay, and won one.. Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:33, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.