Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Fox and the Hound (disambiguation)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 04:01, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

The Fox and the Hound (disambiguation)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Completely unnecessary disambiguation for a novel and its film adaptation; already better handled by the for template at the top of the top of the novel article and an appropriate normal link in the leads of the two films. Making users click an extra step on the novel is rather silly and bad usability. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 13:10, 30 June 2009 (UTC)


 * This disambig is mirror of disambig in ru-wiki. -- AVBtalk 14:50, 30 June 2009 (UTC)}}
 * And? Just because ru-wiki is doing it doesn't mean it should be done here. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 17:44, 30 June 2009 (UTC)


 * And? - this was only informatonal notice, comment, but neither reason nor argument for anything. -- AVBtalk 01:12, 1 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 15:40, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as unneeded orphan dab; hatnote for the novel on the film (base name) article suffices. -- JHunterJ (talk) 16:15, 30 June 2009 (UTC)


 * orphan - it wasn't orphan - see articels's history, referenced from it. -- AVBtalk 17:34, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Right, but it's an orphan now, and navigationally there's no reason for it not to be an orphan (nor for it not to be deleted). -- JHunterJ (talk) 18:54, 30 June 2009 (UTC)


 * delete - unneeded dab page per nom and JHunterJ. 19:11, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not a bad thing, and an A for effort on the part of the creator, but this is one of those things that don't really need a DAB.  The sequel to the first film is distinctive enough to not require it (it will be distinctively called its sequel), which leaves remaining the book and the movie - which themselves can be connected through hat notes.  The sequel can also have a link from the page of its predecessor film. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 01:14, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.