Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Fraternity, Inc.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. WP:SNOW – Juliancolton  | Talk 00:12, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

The Fraternity, Inc.

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Seems to be a nonnotable organization; I've tagged it for speedy and prodded it, and both notices have been removed without any further substantial edits being made to either article. It might also be worth checking into Mu Sigma Nu, which seems to be a related organization. --User:AlbertHerring Io son l'orecchio e tu la bocca: parla! 15:54, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. only came up with this online which is self-published.  Sp in ni  ng  Spark  14:06, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete appears to fail WP:ORG, WP:N, WP:RS at this time. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  14:12, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - google search turned up nada, given title and lack of detail it's almost impossible to find any reliable sources. If someone wants to keep it, they should put in the time to include some actual indicators of notability.  Fails WP:CORP, no evidence of reliable, secondary coverage.  WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules: simple/complex 14:49, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: per WP:Spam.. South Bay   (talk) 17:29, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability.  shirulashem     (talk)   20:37, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - non-notable - we cannot have an article on every single non-notable society in existence. Jdrewitt (talk) 13:24, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - considering the persistent removal of the AfD notice, can this page be protected? Jdrewitt (talk) 13:26, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * There is not a lot of point in doing that, it will make no difference to this debate. It is also wrong in principle as it is possible that an article could be improved to an acceptable standard during the course of a deletion debate (granted unlikely in this case) and protection makes that impossible.  Sp in ni  ng  Spark  14:40, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Ok, thanks for pointing that out - they seemed to have stopped removing the template messages now anyway. Jdrewitt (talk) 15:16, 5 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete fails WP:ORG & WP:N Skier Dude  ( talk ) 23:27, 5 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.