Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Fringemunks


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Sources provided are either trivial or do not meet the criteria set out at WP:Reliable sources. Lankiveil (speak to me) 13:36, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

The Fringemunks

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not notable without significant coverage in independent reliable sources. None provided, none found. Prod removed without comment by IP. Sum mer PhD (talk) 02:24, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 13:17, 11 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Points for creativity, but I'm unable to find significant coverage in independent reliable sources for this project; does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:MUSIC.  Gongshow  Talk 07:32, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 08:01, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

 Don't delete! The guy who created the Fringemunks has not only got a lot of positive feedback from cast members and producers of the show, he has also interviewed one of the main actors. Most importantly, the team respects his work so much that they created a character in the show after him! (comment by M. Hollander) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.104.113.244 (talk) 08:12, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Entertaining, but no. As noted above, no coverage in independent reliable sources. Nwlaw63 (talk) 20:02, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Don't Delete Kind of confusing what the admins are looking for. It seems like this entry's references are legit, including the first one which cites a mention in a book.  Does this artist need to be mentioned by TIME magazine to gain credibility here?
 * Comment I don't know from 'legit', but I don't see the reliable sourcing here. Blog posts, Tweets, Facebook posts and random podcasts don't qualify. An item needs significant coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. Nwlaw63 (talk) 21:16, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment What about the cited book? See reference 1. Does that not count?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.172.52.26 (talk) 21:40, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment - If three sentences -- half a paragraph -- is significant coverage, I'm the pope. - Sum mer PhD  (talk) 01:14, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.