Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Frog Princess (novel)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. (non-admin closure) &mdash; neuro(talk) 17:29, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

The Frog Princess (novel)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Declined speedy; no context, no sources, and not encyclopedic. KurtRaschke (talk) 16:05, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.   -- RayAYang (talk) 16:55, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, this article needed some work. I cleaned it up and added a reception section with reviews from the following reliable sources Publishers Weekly, Booklist and School Library Journal.  So the article now passes the requirements of WP:BK. --Captain-tucker (talk) 17:53, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep following the changes by Captain-tucker. RayAYang (talk) 19:07, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep with changes--Beligaronia (talk) 19:08, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Satsifies notability. 23skidoo (talk) 19:18, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:HEY and recommend withdrawing this AfD now. – sgeureka t•c 20:41, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong keep. Article is now a classic example of what an article on a low-importance novel should look like.  Three reliable sources providing real world context combined with a short & to-the-point plot summary.  Good work.  JulesH (talk) 21:11, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep The book is evidently a best-seller -- 1212 libraries according to WorldCat. It's quite possible that the ed. who started the article didn'tknow thatthe book is actually a notable one by objective standards, but so it turns out to be. that's why we don't do speedies on books. DGG (talk) 22:48, 20 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.