Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Full Moon Show


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Clear consensus towards deleting at this time. The SandDoctor Talk 06:52, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

The Full Moon Show

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No independent sources, wasn't able to find anything in a BEFORE search online. Does not meet WP:GNG signed,Rosguill talk 20:39, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. signed,Rosguill talk 20:39, 8 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Unnotable podcast with cruft, original research, and not a single secondary source. IceWelder  &#91; &#9993; &#93; 20:42, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Merge to Insomniac Games. --M asem (t) 21:10, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note that this was previously a redirect to Insomniac Games and was restored to article form following an RfD that found the redirect to be unhelpful. signed,Rosguill talk 21:57, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm looking at the RFD, which had only one !vote, so it's hard to say there's concensus to say the redirect was unhelpful. It seems a fully valid search term, so I don't see why merging (reduced to a single line or two, not the full article) with a redirect left behind, is anything less than appropriate. --M asem (t) 20:48, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete and don't merge I was considering nominating this page myself and my research found that, not only is this show not notable, it's significantly less notable than a TV series of the same name that aired in the early 1990s. Don't merge because redirects for discussion already voted against this being a redirect and info on this show was erased from Insomniac Games for a reason. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 22:21, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: There is nothing valuable here for a merge. OceanHok (talk) 04:25, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - nothing to show any notability - fails WP:GNG KylieTastic (talk) 12:39, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. There's nothing useful here that warrants a merge. Namcokid  47  (Contribs) 19:14, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete there is not SIGCOV from IS RS that addresses the subject directly and indepth to support a stand alone article.  // Timothy ::  talk  11:53, 11 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.