Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Funkadactyls


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Brodus Clay. &mdash;Darkwind (talk) 01:00, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

The Funkadactyls

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The team has only been on TV for almost a year and has happened to do nothing of note. They have had no notable match or feud and 90% of the time they are not even wrestlers, they're cheerleaders/valets. Fails WP:GNG, there is no coverage by reliable sources showing they are notable by themselves separate for their client, Brodus Clay. See previous AfD examples at Articles for deletion/The Chickbusters, Articles for deletion/The Blondetourage. All the information is present in Brodus Clay, Naomi Knight and Ariane Andrew so there is no need for a separate article. However I would also support a redirect to Brodus Clay.  STATic  message me!  17:13, 7 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete per STAic. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 17:45, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep They have been a tag team for more than a year on T.V. not to mention their time in FCW. They are currently in a feud with The Bella Twins which is resulting both teams making their Wrestlemania debut, the companys biggest ppv of the year, tonight. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DJ8946 (talk • contribs) 18:14, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect Despite being a tag team for more than a year until they are notable the page should be redirect until the team become notable like The Beautiful People otherwise ask for a protection lock so that Admins or Rollback can only edit the page. --Miss X-Factor (talk) 19:19, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:59, 7 April 2013 (UTC)


 * If the page is keep, Its going to need a lot of editing to with sources and fixing problems. --Miss X-Factor (talk) 19:30, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Is Diva-Dirt a reliable source? --DJ8946 (talk • contribs)DJ8946 (talk) 21:23, 7 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete [and replace with redirect]- A speedy delete at that. The conversation at Talk:The Funkadactyls was just silly. There was no reason to revert the redirect. Feed  back  ☎ 07:01, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - I don't see much of a notability problem. They've been around for a year, and are currently in a feud which has been going on for about a month.  Being a cheerleader/valet doesn't automatically make you NN anyway especially when it's done for this long.LordMaldad2000 (talk) 07:38, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment Yesterday, the match in WM was canelled. I think that this change everything, because it was the main point, his appearance in a major event. As a team, they have a year as second characters, supporting Brodus Clay. I think that the Notability is for Brodus Clay, no for supporting characters. I think that redirect is the best option. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 16:09, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment I don't think that their WM match is relevant to the conversation anymore with WP:GNG being the focus. Their feuds, including the one that could've gone to Mania are out.  Being valets (and they are part-time wrestlers, full-time valets) are also out of the conversation.  I'm holding with Keep because I think that the subjects have received significant coverage, unlike the aforementioned Blondetourage and Chickbusters and that the sources currently in place do establish enough notability to cover WP:GNG concerns.LordMaldad2000 (talk) 18:15, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
 * I know they scrapped it. Live streamed. But anyways yes you may redirect because I don't want it to be deleted, but I ask that whenever they do something notable that I may add it onto the page, & then it can be redirect again.DJ8946 (talk)DJ8946 (talk) 23:51, 9 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep Even when not an official name, other team names can just be added to the other names list on the infobox's bio, as if they were aliases. Hansen Sebastian 10:11, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment: How is that a rational for a keep vote? The nomination has nothing to do with their name. It is about if the team is notable per WP:GNG. Which they clearly are not.  STATic  message me!  20:17, 10 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete outside of the occasional match all that they are know for is cheering on Brodius Clay.--174.93.164.125 (talk) 03:01, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.