Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Fury Within (MOD of Diablo II)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was DELETE. Completely unattributable, only has itself as a source, and no claim to notability. Mo0 [ talk ] 01:10, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

The Fury Within (MOD of Diablo II)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete Non-notable mod, fails to assert notability or provide reliable third-party sources. Procedural afd due to contested speedy. The Kinslayer 14:28, 22 March 2007 (UTC) Keep it is a famous mod date back to 2001-2002. And the newer version of it began to be developed from 2006 till now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Horans (talk • contribs) — Horans (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. The Kinslayer 14:30, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
 * As the articles creator, your choice isn't surprising. What is surprising is that a mod thats been around since 2001 has only it's readme as a source, and only it's website, forum and fansite as references. The Kinslayer 14:42, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

contents need to be added. please don't judge it too soon. if you need prove of nobility, goole with the name and "diablo" Horans 14:46, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The burden of evidence is on you to show us the reliable sources, and not on us to find them. The Kinslayer 14:53, 22 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete No evidence provided that this is anything but a non notable user created mod. --Daniel J. Leivick 16:37, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete unless information regarding the mod's importance can be demonstrated by the use of print, magazine, and news sources to verify the contents of the article. -- saberwyn 21:04, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete without verification of its importance, this mod fails our notability guidelines.-- danntm T C 21:12, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Author argues notability, but doesn't back up his argument.
 * Delete utterly non notable. Resolute 05:12, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable, and the only reference is a readme file. --Wirbelwind ヴィルヴェルヴィント (talk) 06:21, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Lacking in secondary coverage. Wickethewok 21:45, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - No sources, no assertion of notability. -- Scottie_theNerd  02:34, 24 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.