Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Future Fire


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 01:00, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

The Future Fire

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Prod contested by an IP address. Article completely lacks any reliable sources showing nontrivial coverage to demonstrate notability to have an article on Wikipedia. Only mentions of this publication are by other nonnotable publications / blogs. DreamGuy (talk) 05:27, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * This may be a relatively minor SF magazine, but as far as I can tell it is pretty respected in the Speculative Fiction Small Press world (especially for the reviews site, which is widely quoted), and I don't see what would be gained by deleting from Wikipedia all articles on small magazines that are not widely discussed in print or mainstream venues. This article has existed since 2006, been edited a few dozen times in that time, and is referenced in several other articles (even if you exclude the two templates it is listed in). I don't think it should be deleted. Gabrielbodard (talk) 22:27, 19 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:45, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:45, 18 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 01:58, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 15:27, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Alpha_Quadrant    (talk)  05:51, 12 January 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.