Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The GNU Organisation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Speedy delete -- Longhair | Talk 12:59, 20 August 2005 (UTC)

The GNU Organisation
Nomination by Erwin Walsh completed by me (no vote) --Doc (?) 12:53, 12 August 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete: I agree, rubbish --Raistlin 12:14, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete: Irrelevant. A school gang. --Norboman 12:55, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
 * As the article itself tells us, this is unverifiable. Delete. Uncle G 13:05:26, 2005-08-12 (UTC)
 * Delete. Jaxl | talk 14:07, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Irrelevant. Of no valid use on this web site at least dok 15:07, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. --Several Times 15:08, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete and somebody take out the Anglican Church Grammar School as the article is half in-jokes, half libel, and a third half refers right back to the "GNU". JDoorjam 16:35, 12 August 2005 (UTC)* ok, cleaned it up a bit.  JDoorjam 20:58, 12 August 2005 (UTC)

Delete ; nonsense. 62.253.96.44 20:04, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Vanity or nonsense. Should this be redirected to Free Software Foundation? ManoaChild 22:54, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete--Cyberjunkie | Talk 06:39, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
 * speedy delete: nonsense --Scott Davis Talk 11:48, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
 * I took the initiative and speedied the article. -- Longhair | Talk 12:59, 20 August 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.