Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Gadfly (magazine)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete, article fails the notability guidelines. Davewild (talk) 20:18, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

The Gadfly (magazine)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Notability not established for this quarterly magazine by undergraduate students. Damiens .rf 16:25, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. All of the citations in the article are to the magazine itself, which raises not just notability but also possible COI issues as well. Cirt (talk) 17:46, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, no attribution of notability to independent sources. But what does the rate of publication have to do with notability? --Dhartung | Talk 23:04, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Notability is not apparent, sorry. Ecoleetage (talk) 02:39, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:08, 26 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.