Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Gall Force Canonicity


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete Mifter (talk) 00:14, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

The Gall Force Canonicity

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Pure original research doesn't cite any source, barely has any content to begin with, and goes against WP:NOT. Jonny2x4 (talk) 21:52, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions.  -- —Farix (t &#124; c) 00:24, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Is currently OR, and even if sourced would probably fit better in the main article (I do like all the story arc splitouts though). 159.182.1.4 (talk) 17:48, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete quoting the article first sentence: The Gall Forcecanon, has seemingly no clear source or indication of the metaseries's true canonicity, due the fact that the franchise's creator has never made any knowns statement in regard.. Original research at full throttle. The "i'm not sure it exists because there is no proof of it and yet i'm writing an article out it" is kind like digging its own grave. --KrebMarkt 19:50, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as original research. Edward321 (talk) 00:07, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete--esp. since the article doesn't seem to properly use the term canonicity. Besides, I don't see the point of a canonicity article in the first place (Herman Melville doesn't even have one). Drmies (talk) 03:43, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The author of the article seems to confuse the concept of literary canon with the pop-culture use of the word, judging by one of his previous edits. Jonny2x4 (talk) 06:56, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as original research -- Whpq (talk) 16:59, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.