Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Game Tour (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   none; removing redundant AfD. Redundant AfD to the first one, which is currently open. (non-admin closure) Tim  meh  !  00:17, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

The Game Tour
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Procedural nomination. Was previously deleted at AfD but three of the four "Delete" votes were by sockpuppets - see Sockpuppet investigations/JamesBurns/Archive. Therefore relisting. I am neutral. Black Kite 19:02, 20 April 2009 (UTC) Tour was reviewed in the Boston Globe and also in The Times, and was covered in Rolling Stone. The tour is notable for drawing record crowds in Argentina (The Washington Post). And I have no reason to doubt JulesH that even more press coverage exists from 1980 and 1981, but thanks to FUTON bias, it probably won't be found in a Google search. DHowell (talk) 23:54, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - quote from the last AfD:
 * Why was it deleted in the first place? For missing sources? Hello? -- Avant-garde a clue - hexa Chord 2  19:28, 20 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete per previous AFD. Reviews alone generally do not denote notability. Rwiggum  (Talk /Contrib ) 19:57, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Says which policy? Also, could you describe a bit what you want for a tour to be notable? A book, a movie, 1 billion Ghits, a star named after, or what? -- Avant-garde a clue - hexa Chord 2  20:22, 20 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep What!?? A tour by the Queens  covered by reliable sources including the Rolling Stones, I don't know what else to say. -- J mundo 20:30, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment I don't think this was deleted. If you take a look at the previous AfD, you'll see it is still open. I think we need to discard this nomination and move all comments to the other AfD. Tim  meh  !  00:00, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Actually, it was. -- Avant-garde a clue - hexa Chord 2  00:03, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Ah, I see; and it was reopened because of the multiple delete comments made by a sockpuppet. Anyway, both AfDs are open for the same article. I'm going to close this one and move the comments to the previous AfD if that's OK with you. Tim  meh  !  00:09, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Just close this, I voted at the other one, mostly repeating my comments from here, plus setting a link to this page. -- Avant-garde a clue - hexa Chord 2  00:13, 21 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.