Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Gamechanger


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete as db-a7. Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 12:14, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

The Gamechanger

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This page has no reliable references. The page was recently created by a new user; it is pure nonsense.  JC  Talk to me My contributions 06:55, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I can now tell that the Facebook page is user-created. As in, it was created by the same person who created this article. -- JC  Talk to me My contributions 07:20, 29 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. The sources on the article are unusable (especially the facebook links), the article is written in a highly promotional tone, and above all else, there aren't any sources out there that are about this actual food item. This is absolutely something that should be speedily deleted as unambiguous advertising, except for the various IPs removing the notice. I have a feeling that this might be a snow close.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 07:26, 29 January 2012 (UTC)tokyogirl79
 * That may have been the user's IP. -- JC  Talk to me My contributions 07:35, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm also adding a "not a vote" bit to the top of this article since the facebook page is trying to direct people to protest the speedy (and probably this page as well). I want to make sure to let the users know that AfD is not based on a vote and that in order to keep the article, you must show reliable sources per WP:RS. Links to the facebook page, sites that do not mention the item, brief mentions, or to sites that are not considered to be reliable and noteworthy cannot be used as sources to show that this item has notability.07:31, 29 January 2012 (UTC)tokyogirl79
 * Yes, I read the page. -- JC  Talk to me My contributions 07:43, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I didn't really mean it for you, but for the random IPs that were popping up and contesting the previous attempts at speedying. Just in case they do get over here before this is closed, I want them to read this bit of info before they decide to just say "don't delete" without any true reason for it to be kept.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 09:02, 29 January 2012 (UTC)tokyogirl79


 * Speedy Delete under A7, no indication of notability. -- Bryce  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 07:28, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete See all refs from article including https://www.facebook.com/pages/The-Gamechanger/305264022846271 . Also, note possible canvassing at that location. I see no redeeming qualities. - UnbelievableError (talk) 07:30, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - Gibberish. Carrite (talk) 07:47, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment, the user who is contesting the page is giving reasons which mean nothing. I just notified the user about removal. -- JC  Talk to me My contributions 07:48, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  JC  Talk to me My contributions 08:01, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.