Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Garden Gang


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 18:21, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

The Garden Gang

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Notability. Where is it. Kempist (talk) 11:02, 12 June 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:12, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 'Very weak keep The fact that it was published by the youngest author for a (seemingly) notable publishing company is certainly an assertation of notability. Given that the books are 30some years old, you'd be hard pressed to find any reliable sources online. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 18:23, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep I believe I may still have some of those books around the place and I agree that the author being so young and working for ladybird is notable. And yes Ladybird books is very notable and people collect their childrens books. The Garden Gang are collectors items and sold on eBay. Dmcq (talk) 22:54, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Comment If the article survives it will need inline citations. I have just tagged the article for lack of inline citations. Looking at the previous comments I too say very weak keep.-- The Legendary   Sky Attacker  01:49, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Ladybird books were extremely well known in Britain for decades, TPH, there's no 'seemingly' notable about it. Nick mallory (talk) 15:13, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.