Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Garden of Earthly Delights in popular culture


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  Singu larity  08:18, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

The Garden of Earthly Delights in popular culture
– (View AfD) (View log)

Delete as per WP:Trivia. Apparently I have to do this myself since the nominator of the article has got himself banned for vandalism. If I can make one caveat it is that there is a public hygine issue here, it seems this kind of cruft has to go somewhere or it'll leak back out onto the main article. It might be better if there was a harmless refuse pit it could be buried in. Twospoonfuls 12:29, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - directory of loosely associated items that offers no illumination of the painting, the items which utilize some image that is or resembles the painting, their (non-existent) iterrelationships or the real world. Oppose merging any of this to any other article. It was clearly split out from another article because it wasn't wanted there and it's just as trivial in another article as it is in a separate article. Keeping it as a refuse dump is not in the spirit of the project and is not a valid reason for keeping the article. Otto4711 17:37, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge. Definitely interesting and potentially encyclopedic, but it needs references and should be written in a less list format.  Best, --  Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles  Tally-ho! 17:56, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Just because something is interesting doesn't mean it should have its own page. Dannycali 18:16, 24 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete I guess it is interesting, but it is bad trivia. Bulldog123 18:35, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, unsalvageable trivia. --Eyrian 22:54, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per WP:NOT and WP:TRIV. Merging won't do, it's still trivia. Giggy  Talk 01:24, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and Otto. Dannycali 18:16, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Very trivial, and no merging is needed. RobJ1981 17:32, 25 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.