Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Gaze (novel)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) -- Sam Sailor Talk! 18:42, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

The Gaze (novel)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

May not pass WP:NBOOKS I dream of horses (T) @ 05:45, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (T) @  05:46, 16 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep Delete  not even a claim of notability, just a plot summary. Not sure that a translation can be notable in its own right anyway Jimfbleak - talk to me?  06:53, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Jim, are you aware this article has been changed and improved? SwisterTwister   talk  06:05, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
 * SwisterTwister, thank you. I note that the article has improved substantially since I posted my delete, and I'm happy to change it now Jimfbleak - talk to me?  06:26, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:11, 16 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep - the article has been improved a lot since the first version which was just a plot summary. While the translation is probably not independently notable, the novel itself appears to be since it has won a major award in Turkey. The article could be better sourced, to be sure. --bonadea contributions talk 15:06, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Per Bonadea. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 17:11, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Likely keep as this is acceptable now especially for a foreign subject. SwisterTwister   talk  06:05, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:05, 19 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep now that it's been improved. Passes notability criteria.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:44, 23 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.