Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The George Washington International Law Review


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep, no consensus for merge, see WP:MERGE to pursue that. --Sam Blanning(talk) 13:02, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

The_George_Washington_International_Law_Review
Not Noteworthy: this is a minor publication by one department of many in one university of very many. die Baumfabrik 01:40, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
 * merge with The George Washington University Law School. --Bachrach44 02:24, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge as per Bachrach44. Cut down though Bwithh 03:39, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect. --Nearly Headless Nick 13:58, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong law student keep All verifiable academic journals are encyclopedic. This one is no exception. Faculty, practitioners and students write scholarly articles for publication. The fact that there are several hundred law journals in the U.S. is not a bar to inclusion. Let's instead focus on deleting the numerous Massively Multiplayer Cruftmags. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 17:04, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep frequently cited per WLU Law's what's cited (71 of 1302 listed for 2005); has ISSN and is available in university libraries (try Google) so meets the criteria for notability. Angus McLellan (Talk) 22:52, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep, per above. An oft-cited notable (and reputable) law journal. Fluit 22:12, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge as per Bachrach44. ~ trialsanderrors 00:10, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
 * BD2412's authoritative word on the subject: This is a notable Law Review, but the article is somewhat small. If reasonably expanded by the inclusion of noteworthy information (famous authors published therein? influential pieces? honors and awards from national panels?) before the end of this AfD, then keep; if not, then merge into the GWULS article until there is enough material to break out into a separate article.  BD2412  T 18:53, 8 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.