Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Georgetown Improv Association


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 12:16, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

The Georgetown Improv Association

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Small-time undergraduate improv troupe. Basically, this is a student club. No third party sources, per WP:GNG. Just having notable former members doesn't confer notability. GrapedApe (talk) 03:38, 28 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep. Having notable former members doesn't confer notability, but the fact that many of them have credited this troupe as assisting them in their successful comedy careers makes it notable.  --  Wikipedical (talk) 00:15, 29 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:05, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:06, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:06, 29 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep while I wish there were more sources in the article, I'm inclined to believe that the ones present and the age of the group indicate that it passes the WP:GNG. Disavian (talk) 05:17, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The sources, except for the former members, are from college newspapers, which don't exactly count as reliable sources. I mean, a college newspaper covers student government meetings like they're the UN, so the fact that the college newspaper gave it coverage doesn't indicate notabilit.y--GrapedApe (talk) 13:40, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Hosting one of the longest running improv festivals is notable. That festival, whose article was previously merged into here, should be key.-- Patrick, o Ѻ ∞ 01:58, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.