Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Girls Want to Go to a Nightclub


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn by Gh87. The consensus votes "keep", mostly after the references and notability have been established. If it was open a little longer, this discussion would have resulted "kept". --Gh87 (talk) 19:37, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

The Girls Want to Go to a Nightclub

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This television episode is the first aired episode of I Love Lucy. However, no citations or any other notability has been established. Therefore, I propose a reincarnation: deletion first, redirection second. Therefore, history is deleted, so no reversions or violations may happen. —Gh87 (talk) 05:54, 15 September 2011 (UTC) Almost forgot: this was deleted under WP:PROD and then contested to be restored as notable for its pilot status. This is a second filmed episode. --Gh87 (talk) 05:56, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep I was all ready to make an argument based on the fact that this was the most popular U.S. TV show for four of its six first years of broadcast, and so on. Maybe that argument would have been a stretch.  Then I tried the Google Books tool, and learned in five seconds that at least six books have given significant coverage to this specific episode.  That left me wondering why this article was nominated for deletion, rather than just simply being improved?  Only the nominator can answer that question.  Cullen 328   Let's discuss it  06:16, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Correction I said that at least six books discuss this episode. In actual fact dozens of books discuss this specific episode in great detail.  How can it not be notable?  Cullen 328   Let's discuss it  06:24, 15 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep Extraordinary number of detailed references in books (thank you Cullen) establishing notability. Nominator being in fear of violation is not a rationale for deletion. References now supplied to demonstrate verifiability. Thincat (talk) 22:49, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep: Notable. SL93 (talk) 23:20, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 00:38, 16 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep - Extremely detailed coverage on how this episode was used to develop characters show that not only does the coverage exist, but it well beyond just a plot description. -- Whpq (talk) 14:57, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep per Cullen.  Deterence  Talk 08:16, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.