Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Global Economy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to International finance .  MBisanz  talk 00:19, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

The Global Economy

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Irrecoverable POV essay on dodgy neologism.  Jerry  delusional ¤ kangaroo 04:59, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete- this topic needs to be covered, but the current article is so awful I think we're better off tearing it down and starting over. Reyk  YO!  05:49, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect While the text itself should be deleted, the name itself is extremely common: searching "global economy" on Google yields over eleven million hits.  Not sure where it should go (perhaps Globalization or International trade?), but either one (and perhaps others that I'm not thinking of right now) would be a very useful redirect.  Nyttend (talk) 14:38, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * There is a major limitation of the effectiveness of the use of Google searching to determine the notability of *terms* themselves. That these two words are used 11 million times on google does not mean that they together *as a term* are notable.  For example search for "And she"; this gives 120M ghits, and "The way" gives over 470M; but I doubt you would argue that we should have an And she or The way article. More closely related, "global and" gives over 6M ghits, "the global" gives nearly 94M.   Jerry   delusional ¤ kangaroo 19:05, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * International finance might be another possible target. Reyk  YO!  19:25, 22 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 08:06, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Beyond salvaging. Carl.bunderson (talk) 20:40, 24 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.