Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Global TV Demand Awards


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 06:19, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

The Global TV Demand Awards

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Does not appear to be notable. Not subject of independent, in-depth coverage in reliable sources. All found sources refer to the subject shows winning one of these awards vs the awards show themselves.  spryde |  talk  14:39, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Websites.  spryde  |  talk  14:39, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Awards-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:45, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Another 'award' which is just blatant ballot stuffing "stan" bait; "there are no judges and no voting committees involved. Instead, winners are selected using Parrot Analytics’ global audience demand measurement system" tells us nothing about how and why these winners are chosen.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 19:01, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: Well, you can pay Guinness to certify your "record", so that tells us about this "award". Non-notable and sourced from a non-reliable source. Oaktree b (talk) 21:49, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: Non notable award determined by a non-notable company - Draft:Parrot Analytics has been refused at WP:AFC six times - Arjayay (talk) 10:01, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per Arjayay. InfiniteNexus (talk) 05:10, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of American television awards. Suitskvarts (talk) 10:44, 29 September 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.