Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The God of Wealth


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. BD2412 T 20:18, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

The God of Wealth

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non notable film, no independent reviews found in a WP:BEFORE. All that was found were articles talking about it's release at New Year's, other wikis, and film database sites. Seems to fail WP:NFILM. Donaldd23 (talk) 23:33, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Donaldd23 (talk) 23:33, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. Donaldd23 (talk) 23:33, 1 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - since the film was released around 9 months ago, reviews should exist by now if they were ever going to exist; fails WP:NFILM Spiderone  07:28, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - LATEST To and, the latest version add major news reports from local Chinese-language website Sin Chew Daily, Kwong Wah and China Press. Also added 1 review by Kakimuvee. Pass notability and review check. Should be speedy keep. User:LoveFromBJM (User talk:LoveFromBJM)
 *  Delete The problem is we do not have any independent RS to review the film. Fails WP:NFILM -- ☆★  Mamushir   ( ✉✉ ) 14:11, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
 * To You can see the latest, Kakimuvee is an independent RS who reviews the film. User:LoveFromBJM
 * Comment You need 2 reviews to pass WP:NFILM Donaldd23 (talk) 23:43, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Added one more review source User:LoveFromBJM (User talk:LoveFromBJM) 3 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep Clearly notable film, another Fehler by the nominator.† Encyclopædius  09:49, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep: Considering this is a Chinese-language film from Malaysia, I'd say finding one good full-length review is pretty good, plus a bunch of pre-release publicity pieces in China Press and others. It looks like this was a mainstream national release in a language that we don't speak, and I think it satisfies the spirit of NFILM. — Toughpigs (talk) 22:49, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak keep- Even though the second review is very brief, everything put together there might be about enough content and valid refs to scrape through WP:NFILM. Sunshine1191 (talk) 02:44, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete — Per rationale by, movie fails to satisfy WP:NFILM. Celestina007 (talk) 03:50, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep as there is enough coverage that has now been referenced in the article including two reviews to show a pass of WP:GNG so that deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 00:27, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep: The film has two reviews + coverage about filming and release. As a whole it is enough to pass WP:NFILM. TheRedDomitor (talk) 13:41, 9 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.