Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Golden Brick


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  07:53, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

The Golden Brick

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Completely lacking references since inception in 2007. – S. Rich (talk) 17:09, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:27, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:27, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:27, 16 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. No sources - no notability. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 13:39, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - No sources, plus group is vague, members were anonymous. Articles says it was part of the 1993 Whitney Biennial but isn't listed in our Wikipedia article: List of Whitney Biennial artists. Parabolooidal (talk) 18:31, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - No sources. Nor was I able to locate any. If the result of this discussion is a delete can the closing admin please also delete Golden brick a re-direct to the article. AlanS (talk) 06:24, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete As with everyone else, I can't even find a shred of evidence that this group ever even existed much less is notable. I am One of Many (talk) 22:51, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.