Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Golden Chariot


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. No delete opinions have been given, nom. withdrawn. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 12:20, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

The Golden Chariot

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No assertion of notability Papa November (talk) 10:33, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. This article is about a tourist train in India. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 13:28, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - Being a Palace on Wheels tourist train is an assertion of notability. Is the subject of independent reliable sources like The Times of India  and The Hindu .  The coverage is very substantial. --Oakshade (talk) 15:24, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - great references, thanks. If they can be worked into the text, I'll happily withdraw the nomination. Papa November (talk) 16:26, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Just add the references. The train sounds really cool. I'd like to go sometime. BTW Palace on Wheels needs the same help. Steve Dufour (talk) 05:39, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Turning them into inline references is useful if you want to immediately turn it into an article of GA or FA status. Other than that, having simple references (not inline) is enough to establish notability even if they don't verify every single detail in the article. There's no need to require more than is strictly neccesary to avoid deletion. - Mgm|(talk) 08:04, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment The issue is that the article doesn't contain those references at all! Papa November (talk) 11:25, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  -- Abecedare (talk) 00:47, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep I have expanded and referenced the article (including the above two sources). Notability should not be an issue now. Abecedare (talk) 02:25, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Interesting article, now well referenced, notable train and route. Just the type of article that makes Wikipedia such a fantastic resource. Priyanath talk 03:06, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: My concerns about notability have now been addressed.  Great work!  Feel free to close the discussion :) Papa November (talk) 08:43, 21 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.