Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Golden Sabre of Muji


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 08:58, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

The Golden Sabre of Muji
A piece of fiction. Wikipedia isn't for publishing your work. Sandstein 16:38, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Sandstein. - No Guru 17:06, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. This is an encyclopedia, that's not an encyclopedia article. NickelShoe 17:17, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete, unencyclopedic. Punkmorten 21:47, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:NOT WP:V (unverifiable praise) WP:VANITY I had originally tagged this as SD:Nonsense, but was told to AfD it instead, but it was prodded before I did the AfD. I'm told things like this article, about which there should be no controversy for deletion, are supposed to be handled by prod.  AfD is evidently only for potentially controversial deletions.  Unfortunately, that policy means worthless nonsense gets to hang around for five days before it can be deleted (of course, AfD isn't quick either).  There needs to be a SD for short stories, plays, and other original works people post in their entirety. Schizombie 21:58, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Meh. What does five days hurt when there are no incoming links, no chance anyone will search for it?  At least it gives us a chance to not just knock the wind out of good-willed but misguided contributors. NickelShoe 01:30, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Original fiction is not encyclopædic, no matter how high the grades you received for it in school. WP:NOT refers.  (aeropagitica)   23:59, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment If Wikipedia adopted a Limbo namespace, this article could be moved to Limbo during the discussion on deletion. Moving an article to Limbo would remove it from the article namespace and prevent search engines from delivering suspicious content while the community decides whether to keep or delete it. For more information, see the discussion on establishing the Limbo namespace. Fg2 05:49, 24 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.