Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Good The Bad & The Hermaphroditic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  Sango 123  00:13, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

The Good The Bad & The Hermaphroditic
Another student film, this one by high school students. Screened at the high school, and, per the article, nobody wanted to buy a copy. As non-notable as they come. Fan-1967 01:17, 1 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete - as it's not even on IMDB it's hardly likely to be notable regardless. Mark Grant 01:27, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete this is what YouTube is for. NawlinWiki 01:32, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. GassyGuy 01:44, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree with NawilnWiki this is what YouTube is for Popcorn2008 02:20, 1 August 2006 (UTC)Popcorn2008
 * Delete At least it's honest: "No profit has been made as of July 31, 2006." IMO, though, movies not even on the IMDB shouldn't have articles here. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  02:22, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment "No profit" says a lot when the picture's budget was $390. Fan-1967 14:09, 1 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. And I don't wanna know who the stars were.... SynergeticMaggot 02:56, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- Alias Flood 03:02, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. — Natha  n  ( talk ) / 04:30, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete any film with a poster made in photoshop 3 should be deleted =D mboverload @  05:56, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The embedded information says CS2... Zetawoof(&zeta;) 09:09, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unverifiable - no independent information appears to be available anywhere. Zetawoof(&zeta;) 09:09, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:V, WP:VAIN, WP:NN and WP:NFT. Scorpiondollprincess 13:49, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. --PresN 15:53, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per mboverload (and scorpiondollprincess) alpha Chimp  laudare 17:44, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I cannot believe you people take the time to put up negative comments on a public encyclopedia. Go fucks yourselves. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.233.57.126 (talk • contribs)
 * lol comment The above IP just posted this on my talk page, LOL:  	I really hope you die in real life. Thats all I have to say. I hope you live to the ripe old age of 90, and then on your deathbed you are disemboweled by gay stockbrokers with a set of dull kitchen knives. --mboverload @  20:45, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as unverifiable. Block the anon. --Core des at talk. ^_^ 00:07, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Some P. Erson 01:53, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable per article. On the positive side, it'd be nice if all non-notable articles were this easy to find. fuzzy510 07:32, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as not notable, also per Scorpiondollprincess. Sarah Ewart (Talk) 16:31, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.