Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Great Cull


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:29, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

The Great Cull

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:NOTNEO

This appears to be a term used (meh) by people at times, but evidently in reference to everything besides this, including a lot of sports references. Overall, non-notable term, coined in a non-notable book, by a non-notable author. Timothy Joseph Wood 14:21, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:59, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:59, 29 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete as per nom. The article has a single source that discusses the topic of the article, which is a non-notable book. Power~enwiki (talk) 04:38, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. While the book might qualify for an article if it could be properly sourced as satisfying WP:NBOOK (which this isn't), the book's thesis is not a separate article topic in its own right from the book qua book. Bearcat (talk) 18:10, 3 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.