Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Great Dome Robbery


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 02:33, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

The Great Dome Robbery

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable movie. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 00:46, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:47, 7 January 2016 (UTC)


 * ALTS:
 * year:
 * type:
 * director:
 * studio:
 * distributor:
 * star:
 * star:
 * star:


 * Keep: I found a rather lengthy review in The Daily Record. Looking for more.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 03:17, 7 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep. I don't agree that it's non-notable. Google Books finds a few mentions, then there's the above-mentioned review, and Highbeam finds mentions in the Mirror and Daily Record. There's a whole bunch of films on WP with fewer verifiable sources than that. Newbiepedian (Hailing Frequencies) 03:25, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Weak keep While other stuff exist is usually not a valid argument at AfDs, the lengthy review, pointed out by through a diligent WP:BEFORE and the other coverages I found may be enough to satisfy WP:NFILM. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 21:59, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Admittedly the one-line unsourced stub first brought to AFD was not very encouraging, but from nothing can come something to better serve the project and its readers.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 01:14, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. North America1000 16:30, 12 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.