Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Great Shrewsbury Snowfight of February 3rd


 * Keep Significant on at least a local level; ie. report in at least one local newspaper. Many people from the town & county showing a great deal of interest. Fulfills all criteria of a useful article, and none of a redundant one.
 * Delete Although I enjoyed reading it, the article fails the the Significant coverage guideline of WP:Notability. ttonyb1 (talk) 21:13, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Glad that you found the article useful. Though you directly cannot appreciate the significance of the article, I assure you many do, and will. Thank you.
 * This was on the talk page:

I must say that I am outraged that this document is being considered for deletion. Such thoughts go against the spirit of wikipedia. As an open source and public collaboration project, it would be totally unacceptable for someone to selectively delete articles, particularly ones such as these that chart real events, though it is important that some of the facts are more thoroughly authenticated. THIS WILL TAKE TIME! -- Daniel Greenwood, 03.02.2009 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rollingstone69 (talk • contribs) 21:46, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

I did not like to spoil the fun with my Snow delete, but, in the words of G &  S, Such a opportunity may never come again. DGG (talk) 22:30, 3 February 2009 (UTC)