Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Great US TV on UK DVD Retreat


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  Sango 123  01:53, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

The Great US TV on UK DVD Retreat
No sources, basically no wf'cation, no cats, extremely POV title with abbreviations, just an odd article. Added to numerous "DVD" sections of the so-called "affected" show's articles. Staxringold talkcontribs 02:30, 29 August 2006 (UTC)


 * del an occasional nonnotable coinage. Verifiabvlity problem: Zero google hits. `'mikka (t) 02:47, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Original research, no sources. Just because no further DVDs of these series have been produced for international markets doesn't mean the American TV companies have given up on those markets (unless there is something that says this is true). Tinlinkin 04:19, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete agree, unverifiable -- Samir  धर्म 04:48, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Bloody meaningless. Lost Knob 04:56, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, unverifiable OR. --Core des at talk. ^_^ 07:05, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, nonnotable, nonverifiable. --Shirahadasha 08:06, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. &mdash; Khoikhoi 08:24, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Even the title is POV. Also unverifiable. Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 11:05, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete non notable and unverifiable mathewguiver 16:19, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete The main problem here is not notablility but unverifibility. -- S iva1979 Talk to me  22:24, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per everyone, though I think it's interesting that Cheers is apparently unpopular in the UK. In the US, it's sacred. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  12:55, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as unverified. Heimstern Läufer 22:00, 2 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.