Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Green Farm


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The consensus is that the home is of local rather than national/international interest, and so does not meet the notability criteria  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 06:38, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

The Green Farm

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable home. Of local interest only. Not a listed historic place. Not covered significantly in any architectural sources. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:47, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.Deathlibrarian (talk) 01:52, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:58, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:59, 1 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:19, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Delete - Not notable. Fails WP:GNG and WP:LOCAL. {{{sub|C}}  A S U K I T E  T} 02:40, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge with Lakewood, NY -- Atethnekos (Discussion, Contributions) 08:57, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge/Keep I'm still working on this page and have not yet incorporated the bulk of the information. The Green Farm has appeared in many books about the history of Lakewood, and information can be found on many of the websites. There is rich history to the establishment. I believe the page should not be deleted, but perhaps it could be merged elsewhere? — Preceding unsigned comment added by AliRCzar (talk • contribs) 15:11, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep a notable historical structure, has some coverage in sources which I added to the article. Wincent77 (talk) 23:09, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment The coverage added by Wincent amounts to local interest only:
 * a note in the Chataquan News (the local newspaper for the Chataqua neighbohood) of a fire in the building;
 * an entry in a travel guide about the area;
 * a note in The Buffalo News (also a local newspaper; Lakewood falls into local coverage area of the Buffalo daily) that the building has received zoning approval for conversion to a B&B
 * None of this amounts to significant coverage. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 21:44, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:00, 19 October 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.