Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Green Hope


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  MBisanz  talk 01:26, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

The Green Hope


This topic about a Hong Kong television series appears to fail WP:N. After source searching, haven't found significant coverage in reliable sources. Google News archives has zero results other than this Wikipedia page. Posting this at AfD, rather than prodding the article, in hopes to avoid the potential for systemic bias on Wikipedia. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:36, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 07:23, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 16 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment. This is a known series in Hong Kong. It's very old, I'm pretty sure I still see posters of it sometimes at old video shops, but other than that I don't think there will be any internet references for it. Maybe in very old print gossip magazines. Dengero (talk) 01:23, 16 November 2012 (UTC)}
 * Keep: Not sure what the guidelines are for notability of TV shows, but this was a reasonably well-known show, still recognizable and "referable" as a pop culture artifact. Regarding systemic bias, I'm fairly sure that a US TV show with similar impact and audience would be covered (extensively) in En-wikipedia, for whatever that's worth. That said, not many reliable sources in English (search "The Green Hope TVB" and a number of blogs and the like appear, which speak to lingering interest, which suggests but does not prove notability). Obviously a lot more in Chinese, probably sufficient if anyone wants to do some digging. BTW, 2000 is "very old"? I feel ancient now...
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 01:34, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Theo polisme  01:15, 29 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep widely broadcast TV show. Stowonthewolder (talk) 01:47, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.