Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Groosalug


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedy redirect to The Groosalugg. Redirects for spelling mistakes are common. This prevents someone else who doesn't realize they made a spelling mistake from making a new article.  howch e  ng   {chat} 23:53, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

The Groosalug
Blank, wrongly spelled and thus unnecessary. Real article at The Groosalugg Kusonaga 11:29, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect as usual. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 11:31, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Why redirect and not just delete? I could re-direct if you want, but it just seems useless to me.

Kusonaga
 * Redirects for common misspellings are allowed and encouraged. I have no idea what the Groosalugg is, but I guess many people are likely to forget the double g at the end. If this is not a common misspelling, then I'd vote delete. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 11:50, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * So just delete the deletion notice and go for a redirect?


 * Redirect seems fair in this case. PJM 13:04, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect works for me. --Pboyd04 16:03, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect --Quarl 21:53, 29 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.