Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Gryphon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) sst✈  05:12, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

The Gryphon

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A local student newspaper, without evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. The references are not substantial coverage of the subject. (A PROD was removed without any explanation.) The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 21:11, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  23:31, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  23:31, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 08:05, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:29, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. A well established student newspaper that has won several UK national media awards.  A threatened closure in 2014 was covered in several national newspapers as well as specialist press like the Press Gazette. Nthep (talk) 14:28, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Has coverage in national media and other good sources referenced to the article, and has won significant awards, beating the Oxbridge elite, the article has RS and I therefore think that WP:BASIC is passed. Atlantic306 (talk) 21:54, 12 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.