Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Guardian Project


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) v/r - TP 00:21, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

The Guardian Project

 * – ( View AfD View log )

See Talk:Toronto Maple Leafs for rationale. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 15:55, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 18:47, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 18:48, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Keep Lame, but certainly notable. Possibly most notable for its complete and utter failure. Coverage includes: CBC.ca, Yahoo (blog), MSN.ca, MTV.ca. I didn't include comic sources, because I have no idea how to gauge what is reliable and what isn't, but there are a lot. Canada Hky (talk) 19:13, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Extremely reluctant Keep: As a participant in the discussion the nom links, I empathize over the premise of torching this bit of ephemeral fluff - heck, as a stone hockey fan, as a long-time editor on the hockey WikiProject and as a one-time Marvel comic subscriber, I just heard of this yesterday, which says something. Unfortunately, the nom hasn't proffered a valid reason to delete, and this has certainly generated enough media interest to meet WP:V.   Ravenswing  19:40, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Seems to have gotten more than enough media coverage. And being that it was created by Stan Lee I think that in itself probably gets it up there. -DJSasso (talk) 11:37, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep The "rationale" for deleting this article clearly falls into the I don't like it category. I don't like it either and wish it never happened, but there has been lots of media coverage to establish notability. The article needs to have those references Canada Hky mentioned and links added, but it shouldn't be deleted. Spidey  104  14:48, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. There has been enought media coverage to establish notability and verifiability. The hockey wikiproject can discuss and vote a rule to avoid any kind of mention of The Guardian Project in the hockey articles. In my opinion, it is better than trying to delete this article. --Crazy runner (talk) 09:51, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.