Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The HAND Foundation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete promotional. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 18:26, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

The HAND Foundation

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional article for the foundation. Extensive listing of fields in which it has had only minor involvement, and reliance upon the names of other much more notable organizations. Almost all the regs are from a  DGG ( talk ) 16:18, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as noticeably promotional and troubled, suggesting this may be best deleted and restarted if needed, as this is considerably still questionable for any notability. SwisterTwister   talk  18:00, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  18:00, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  18:00, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  18:00, 11 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Two options, if it's not notable Delete or if it is WP:TNT . ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 19:19, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as unsalvageably promotional article with no neutral version to revert to; if it's notable, it can later be re-created as a neutral article. Someone's probably going to say that notability is separate from article quality; but we sometimes forget that deletion on Wikipedia is not solely about Notability either: It's also about what Wikipedia is not.  The content of this page, in all revisions, and regardless of the subject, is unsuitable for Wikipedia.  See essay Delete the junk.  If someone can create an article about this subject, that establishes WP:GNG without "help" from a public relations firm, let's see them do it.  In the mean time &mdash; actually, in any case &mdash; this press packet posing as a Wikipedia page needs to go away, per WP:NOTPROMOTION and WP:NOTHOST. --Closeapple (talk) 06:58, 13 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.