Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Hacksmith


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep per WP:WITHDRAW. (non-admin closure) Pulisi (talk) 08:20, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

The Hacksmith

 * – ( View AfD View log )

BLP of Youtuber without independent evidence of meeting WP:NBIO. MrsSnoozyTurtle (talk) 02:27, 5 December 2020 (UTC) Withdrawn by nominator. Sorry for the drama. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle (talk) 01:49, 6 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep per WP:CREATIVE and WP:ENTERTAINER. We tend to keep articles on BLPs who have large followings with basic coverage. I am a bit confused as to why the nominator thinks that there isn't enough "independent evidence of meeting WP:NBIO". These articles  were published within the past 24 hours alone. A Google search reveals lots of coverage. Scorpions13256 (talk) 04:17, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
 * On the surface, the sources I found seem independent. Scorpions13256 (talk) 04:35, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:18, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:18, 5 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep this is the second time myself as the page creator has interacted with this editor who tagged the article (MrsSnoozyTurtle). I'm not stating it but this could be seen as an attack on an editor as these edits 1 which I responded to here. Also please see her talk page history and examine it, I'm clearly not the only editor affected. Thanks, --Pulisi (talk) 09:01, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep CBC article, Men's Health article , and NY Post would be my top three sources cited in the article to contribute to WP:GNG/WP:BASIC. They all seem to be reliable indpendant sources. If that wasn't enough, 8mil. subscribers in a secondary source  clearly indicates meeting WP:ENT crit. 2. Samsmachado (talk) 20:41, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep The MensHealth and CBC articles give enough SIGCOV. Jumpytoo Talk 20:46, 5 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.