Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Hairy Chest of Resilience Badge (Urban Rangers)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. Carlossuarez46 02:28, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

The Hairy Chest of Resilience Badge (Urban Rangers)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Normally I'm quite defensive of stuff labelled 'fancruft', however, a fictional award apparantly only mentioned in a single episode of Ed, Edd n Eddy is really pushing it. Non notable and lacking in reliable sources. Darksun 17:10, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete WP is not a collection of random information. This is not at all notable, nor is it sourced. Faithlessthewonderboy 17:57, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete Non-notable fictional award. Mr.Z-man  talk ¢ 18:14, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge (or at least redirect) to Urban Rangers. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  21:46, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge - I'd say redirect but I can't imagine anyone typing "The Hairy Chest Of Resilience" into the search box. -WarthogDemon 22:59, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. The text of this article appears to be already present in Urban Rangers (which itself had been redirected to Ed, Edd n Eddy until content was recently readded to it). Also, does the edit history of this article's creator look to anyone else suspiciously like those of the many socks of blocked user Danny Daniel? Deor 00:42, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete no notability whatsoever. I also restored the redirect. This kind of garbage needs to be deleted with strong prejudice. Wikipedia is not a kiddie fan page. -- Elaich   talk 21:33, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per lack of notability Corpx 03:33, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom. --Storm Rider (talk) 07:47, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom. (presuming that what little is worthwhile has been merged) Mathmo Talk 01:40, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Sorry. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 19:24, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete No reliable secondary sources. Jay32183 01:41, 12 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.