Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Hampstead Trash (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MelanieN (talk) 22:58, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

The Hampstead Trash
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Singularly non-notable blog about a school (which itself looks less than noteworthy, but consensus usually falls in favour of keeping the spam pages of schools). A shedload of references, but when you actually look at them virtually all are self-references; those that aren't all relate to a single incident in which the blog's author was reported to the police by the school. (Converted to AFD from WP:PROD as technically it's been nominated for deletion before; that closed as "no consensus" due to lack of participation rather than anyone arguing to keep.) &#8209; Iridescent 17:10, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Basically a vanity page full of WP:CRUFT.  References are circular. -- Y not? 17:26, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Is this really encyclopaedic content? Jackninja5 (talk) 17:42, 19 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.