Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Harrington Project


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to University Hospitals of Cleveland. (non-admin closure) Randykitty (talk) 20:43, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

The Harrington Project

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

the references are either press releases, announcements, or have nothing to do with this specific project. It's promotion for both the project and the company that sponsors it, which is not notable enough for an article. Most of the recipients seem to be at the Associate professor level and probably not yet notable.  DGG ( talk ) 04:07, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:32, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:32, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:33, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:33, 20 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Redirect to University Hospitals of Cleveland, where I have already created a short paragraph about this project. Basically this is a 2012 grant to those hospitals. (Took me some digging to figure out what it actually is; I have clarified the lead.) The rest of the article - the long list of "scholars", the seemingly unrelated information about a for-profit company - is spam and not worth preserving. But the project itself has received enough local coverage to rate a mention at the Hospitals article. --MelanieN (talk) 22:11, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. MelanieN (talk) 22:13, 24 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000(talk) 20:00, 27 January 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.