Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Haunted House (2005 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. (WP:NPASR). While this is being closed as no consensus due to an overall lack of participation after two relistings, this could be boldly redirected if editors deem this to be appropriate. (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica1000 04:52, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

The Haunted House (2005 film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of notability.  Jay  Jay What did I do? 01:31, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  01:45, 27 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment: this is a tough one, and I did find the deadlink archived ay the Wayback Machine... but it is a sales site that pretty much let's us know this non-English Khmer language film does at least exist. But what with the search term of "hanunted house" being so common, we need to refine our parameters:
 * Writer:
 * Studio:
 * Director:]
 * Producer:
 * It's quite possible that Khmer language sources may exist, but we will need Cambodian Wikipedians to find and offer them.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 05:15, 27 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cambodia-related deletion discussions.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 05:19, 27 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 17:11, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Redirect to Campro_Production, but leave the article history. The problem here is that coverage is most likely in Khmer. I did find one lone English source, which makes me slightly optimistic about sources in other languages. If a Khmer speaker can come in and find sources I'm willing to change my opinion, but otherwise this shoudl redirect with history. I figure leaving the history will give a Khmer fluent editor the chance to improve the article if they can provide sourcing. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   04:10, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  22:50, 12 September 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.