Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Haunting of Sunshine Girl


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. causa sui (talk) 19:17, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

The Haunting of Sunshine Girl

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Unremarkable YouTube series. No significant claims of notability outside YouTube, little significant coverage. Google news search on "Haunting of Sunshine Girl" shows only one article, published yesterday. Standard search shows mainly social media links, primary sources, or user-generated media sites. MikeWazowski (talk) 15:56, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:49, 17 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete for now - Nominator's argument "No significant claims of notability outside YouTube" is highly valid - people who are online regularly and have an awareness of internet trends and memes often forget that they usually mean nothing to the wider world (no negative criticism implied here, I've myself been guilty of this and confused friends & family as a result). As yet, this show has only been reported in one reliable secondary source indicating lack of mainstream notability and popularity. ŞůṜīΣĻ ¹98¹ Speak 18:18, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - There have been two more independent sources showing up - one of them a radio interview, the other one from a movie review page (http://popcereal-badronald.blogspot.com/2011/10/haunting-of-sunshine-girl-why-are-you.html). I'm sure that there will be more to come. So if you delete it, the article will return in a couple of months fulfilling the creteria of notability anyhow. The show is still gaining popularity. Matthy1974 (talk) 06:38, 22 October 2011 (UTC) — Matthy1974 (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Note - This is my first post - so who cares? Noone can know if this is a Single purpose acount. Since I'm German I'll be a) more often to find in German Wikipedia (not until now, but I WILL be) and b) I have nothing to do with the subject that is described in the article since people who created this series are Americans. I'm a newbie - so what? That doesn't make me a PR puppet. Note that nomination for speedy deletion, nomination for deletion and spa tag came from the same person. Matthy1974 (talk) 22:09, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Delete I think it should be deleted. It have searched it and not any results came up.KF5LLG (talk) 00:58, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment: Mathy, the best way to combat a SPA tag on this branch of the wikipedia is to get active and either help work on other articles or put an opinion in on some of the other AFD conversations. 05:02, 24 October 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 00:20, 1 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep, looks like it has received a bit of source coverage. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 20:56, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep per Cirt. Sourcing meets WP:GNG. -Nathan Johnson (talk) 17:50, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.