Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Heart of the Matter: God Under the Microscope


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:00, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

The Heart of the Matter: God Under the Microscope

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Delete. Non-notable documentary (unfortunately). Has not progressed beyond three short sentences in three long years! Contested PROD. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 23:33, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  —-- Alan Liefting (talk) - 03:18, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions.  —-- Alan Liefting (talk) - 03:18, 1 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep or merge I'd say, like any Paramount movie, any BBC documentary is almost always inherently notable. At least it should be merged into (an as of yet to be created) List of BBC documentaries. 131.211.84.85 (talk) 11:00, 1 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep Wikipedia has a goal to cover all educational topics, instead of just popular culture ones that get more media attention. Notable people, who have their own Wikipedia articles, were involved in this.  It was also done by BBC.  This isn't some student film, or a political thing done by a group to promote their own agenda.  Therefore the documentary is notable.   D r e a m Focus  00:31, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Notability isn't inherited. Unless there's some significant coverage of this documentary the article should be deleted. --Anthem 16:13, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * All Nobel prize winning people are inheritedly notable. All works by a famous author from at least a hundred years ago are automatically notable enough to have their own articles.  Different standard for more recent authors it seems.  All documentary which BBC thinks notable enough to make and put their name on, which many notable people also are part of and put their name on, is in fact notable.   D r e a m Focus  08:51, 6 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:49, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Delete - fails the general notability guideline. --Anthem 16:13, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note Anthem of joy has been indef blocked as a sockpuppet of Claritas . --Tothwolf (talk) 04:15, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:34, 14 June 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.