Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Hebrew Prophets, nabiy'


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Nevi'im. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 01:46, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

The Hebrew Prophets, nabiy'

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This is a totally incomprehensible mish-mash that violates WP:SYNTH, WP:NOR, WP:NEO ("nabiy'" does not explain or help to understand "The Hebrew Prophets"). What little is salvageable should be merged into the main Nevi'im (Hebrew Prophets) article as some sort of "Interpretations" section and not be a probable violation of WP:CONTENTFORKING to it. IZAK (talk) 08:36, 16 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Merge and Redirect to main Nevi'im (Hebrew Prophets) article. IZAK (talk) 08:36, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions.  IZAK (talk) 08:36, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  IZAK (talk) 08:36, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bible-related deletion discussions.  IZAK (talk) 08:36, 16 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Merge and Redirect to Nevi'im. I can't see any reason to have two article on the same subject. --Steven J. Anderson (talk) 09:57, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge and Redirect to Nevi'im. I developed this from an earlier article entitled "Shouters". There was very little and the title seemed unprofessional. I followed the lead to the Spanish article and put a google translation into the article. But, I agree that it is in rough. The Spanish article seemed quite good. I would not like to see all the Spanish information lost in the merge. But, I am in favor of the merge nonetheless. DonaldRichardSands (talk) 18:59, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge and Redirect per IZAK, if anything is actually salvageable. This smacks of WP:NOR and WP:SYNTH. Yoninah (talk) 19:34, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. The article is poor, and needs both renaming and extending. However, the topic is notable, and sources for a good article exist. Merging to Nevi'im is not the answer, since that article is about a set of books, and this article is about a religious community mentioned in 1 Samuel: a completely different topic. -- 202.124.73.248 (talk) 10:09, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect per the above. If this topic is indeed notable (and it might be), then a fresh start on it would be best. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 12:50, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
 * keep the topic is clearly notable. The article needs improvement, and the way to improve articles is to keep and improve them, even if a good deal of the text needs rewriting. There's no advantage in deleting first.  DGG ( talk ) 20:11, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.