Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Helpers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Relisted four times and per the work by Michael (non-admin closure)  TheSpecialUser TSU 00:10, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

The Helpers

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I stumbled along this page while I was looking through the category for 2012 films. I tried finding sources for this, but ultimately all I could find were a few articles that are heavily based on the same press release. The movie has released, apparently in September, but there's an almost complete lack of in-depth coverage for this movie to show that it passes WP:NFILMS. I just don't see where this is ultimately notable and considering that there aren't even any reviews out there or any other coverage, I'm not sure that it really ever will be. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 08:57, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 08:57, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I am open to the idea of someone userfying this until/if the film ever gets that coverage.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 08:59, 21 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, WikiPuppies  bark dig 16:42, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 16:59, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Delete - No coverage by reliable and professional news sources that indicate the notability of the subject according to WP:NFILMS. Vacation9 (talk) 18:26, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 03:43, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Theo polisme  02:16, 19 November 2012 (UTC)




 * Keep for now and, as the stub definietly needs work, we can allow improvements through regular editing. We have a recently released low-budget, independent horror film that has received coverage in the acceptable genre sources Dread Cental and Bloody Disgusting,  in the Russian source Game Source, the German source Das DGF-Magazin, the Spanish source Terror Weekend, and genre English sources Views from the Edge, Beyond Hollywood, et all.  We do not expect nor demand that Roger Ebert or New York Times film critics can or would review every independent, low-budget film ever made, and understand that for newer films, genre sources are often suitable for their reviews and analysis of genre topics. Sure... this topic will never be as notable as highly touted big budget - big studio films, but we are allowed to decide that as a topic, it might just be notable enough to allow herein for improvements over time and through regular editing.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 22:41, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.