Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Hippo Collective


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 06:13, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

The Hippo Collective

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I can find absolutely no independent references in reliable sources to establish notability - all mention I have found is in sites that are self-published or sponsored, and some CVs etc. where the subject mentions their involvement in the publication. Note that there's also an apparently completely unrelated documentary project with the same name. I Like It; maybe someone can prove me wrong. RichardOSmith (talk) 19:10, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Smacks of self-promotion.--Rpclod (talk) 21:13, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:01, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:01, 25 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete: An article on a new publication whose editor's first name is Jonathan, contributed by the WP:SPA editor User:Jono46k. The article contains no claim to attained notability and no independent references; Highbeam, Questia and Guardian searches turn up nothing, and Google just the usual social media links. Fails WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 07:23, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable, a case of WP:PROMOTION. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:22, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.