Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Historical Bridge Spanning the Interval of the Old Testament and the New Testament


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS. Mo0 [ talk ] 11:21, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

The Historical Bridge Spanning the Interval of the Old Testament and the New Testament
Delete. Original research. Article adds no useful information to Wikipedia, badly named. Looks almost like it's someone's high middle school history paper outline. &mdash;Preost talk  contribs  20:28, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep and Rename. Has potential as an interesting topic, needs to be expanded/renamed as well. --MisterHand 20:35, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete apparent original research. There is some scope for an encyclopaedic article on this, I guess, but not with this title. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 21:02, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep per MisterHand. -- JJay 21:07, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. It's a start for a worthwhile article (but has to be renamed).   Edgar181 21:12, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: If it is renamed, it should be something to the effect of Intertestamental period, which is a much more standard naming convention for this Protestant interpretation of Biblical history. It would also need to be completely rewritten.  For whatever consideration it may be worth, its sole editor is in the eighth grade. &mdash;Preost  talk  contribs  21:48, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete NOR.--nixie 21:49, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. While the subject matter may be notable, neither the article's title nor content has any worth. There's nothing to move. Flyboy Will 22:01, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment. The subject is definitely worthy of an article but it needs a new and shorter name. I don’t particularly like Intertestamental period, per A.S. Damick above, but I can’t think of a better one at the moment. &bull;DanMS 02:54, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, but rename per ASDamick. Cut out almost everything but the introduction and make it a stub. -- JLaTondre 03:24, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom --Jaranda wat's sup 07:14, 1 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.