Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The History Press


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. -- Cirt (talk) 16:53, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

The History Press

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This article was written by an employee of the company and not one of the references is independent. It either needs a rewrite with independent sources, or removal. Guy (Help!) 09:54, 7 September 2010 (UTC)


 * I contributed to the article and definitely do not work for the company. I am an author with them however. Does this make be biased?? Keep the article and expand. Peterlewis (talk) 10:22, 7 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:30, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - the lack of independent references is an issue but it doesn't mean the article should be deleted. Improve and reference, but do not delete it.  I'd have time to fix it up if I had time.  I'll see what I can do over the next week, but I'm pretty busy.  Gillyweed (talk) 01:40, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - Sufficient publications to justify inclusion. Not written in a commercial way. Carrite (talk) 03:03, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - Improve, not delete. WP:ATD Keristrasza (talk) 11:36, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.